A Bit of a Rant
current mood: annoyed
My view isn't trendy, and it sure as hell isn't going to be popular, but it's my journal and my opinion.
If anyone would like to actually debate the issue, please feel free - that's how we all learn and develop. I welcome it.
I'm bored with people jumping on the 'easy target' that is the Catholic church. I'm not Catholic, but i watch a hordes of people grabbing the next excuse for christian-bashing, and I feel somewhat saddened. It's nauseating and exceptionally cowardly. So, you don't like the Christian church? Don't go to one, but let people have freedom of religion, it's called being part of a civilised society.
The voices of outrage currently accusing the Pope of bigotry didn't sound so loud when Islam4UK were planning their march through Wooton Bassett, or when Channel 4 decided that President Armadinajad of Iraq was a great candidate for the alternative Christmas speech. Never mind not wanting to facilitate gay adoption, there's a man who would like to behead every homosexual person on the planet. Where were you then? Oh, that's right, it didn't give you an excuse to bash the church, so you couldn't be arsed.
It's 'cool' to bash the church, right kids? But when it comes to the real injustices in our world, then it's easier to sit back in a glow of smug self-satisfaction.
Oh, and for the record, I can see the Pope's perspective. He (like the majority of practicing Christians), feel that placing children to be parented within homosexual relationships are not in the best interests of a child. Whether this is right or wrong is besides the point. If Christian adoption charities don't want to hand children over to gay couples because it's agains their beliefs., then what the hell is wrong with gay couples who wish to adopt approaching secular agencies, such as their local authority. I don't see how this is any different to charities set up to assist BME groups, or only women. If you don't fit the target group, go elsewhere. I wouldn't turn up at an Asian women's support centre and ask for help, I'd go to the CAB. If you want to protest this decision, why aren't you protesting against the gay police support charity, because they don't help straight people? We're either all people and all equal by law (in which case gay, lesbian, black, disabled etc groups must be instantly banned), or we're all entitled to our own freedom of conscience, and we all vote with our feet. Which seems fairer to you, because you can't have your all-inclusive cake and eat it.
Please don't bring the Catholic church's history of child abuse into this, because it isn't the here and now, and is (whilst a horrendous stain on the church that will take decades to shift) an irrelevance in this argument. The same for accusing the Catholic faith of spreading AIDS because of their stance on contraception. The church doesn't believe in contraception, but it also doesn't believe in sex outside marriage, so AIDS spread through sexual contact is something of a moot point. There are very few Catholics in the (predominently african) nations who currently have the highest HIV infection rates, and those that are there are as aware of the churches' teaching on extramarital sex as they are of its stance on condoms. Why therefore does this form part of any otherwise unrelated argument about the Catholic church?
If you want to debate my point of view on this, I welcome it, but please stick to the issue at hand.





